JodyTJ Posted August 5, 2013 Report Share Posted August 5, 2013 I don't know if my understanding of the Godhead is correct, but this is what I understand so far: the Father and the Son are distinct beings, who are perfect, and work in a common purpose. The Holy Ghost is God's life force on earth and guides God's children (us). Also, is Jesus considered a "god" or just God's Son who will reign as King after His second coming? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roseslipper Posted August 5, 2013 Report Share Posted August 5, 2013 God the Father, God the Son, God the Holy Ghost Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JodyTJ Posted August 5, 2013 Author Report Share Posted August 5, 2013 God the Father, God the Son, God the Holy GhostWow:(, I was told the complete opposite. That there was no God the Son or God the Holy Ghost in the LDS Church. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TalkativeIntrovert Posted August 6, 2013 Report Share Posted August 6, 2013 (edited) They are 3 separate entities. God appears to Joseph Smith an introduces his son Jesus Christ. God and Jesus have physical bodies, the Holy ghost is a spirit. Edited August 6, 2013 by TalkativeIntrovert Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JodyTJ Posted August 6, 2013 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2013 They are 3 separate entities. God appears to Joseph Smith an introduces his son Jesus Christ.God and Jesus have physical bodies, the Holy ghost is a spirit.Ah, that makes more sense. So they're all God, but three separate entities. That does make more sense then the Catholic and Protestant view. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Connie Posted August 6, 2013 Report Share Posted August 6, 2013 For some official source reading, see link below. :)God, Godhead Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maureen Posted August 6, 2013 Report Share Posted August 6, 2013 Ah, that makes more sense. So they're all God, but three separate entities. That does make more sense then the Catholic and Protestant view.Jody, what do you think the Catholic and Protestant view of the Godhead is?M. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mnn727 Posted August 6, 2013 Report Share Posted August 6, 2013 Wow:(, I was told the complete opposite. That there was no God the Son or God the Holy Ghost in the LDS Church. You were misinformed or you misunderstood. Its ok, now you know. All 3 are members of the Godhead. They are 3 separate and distinct individuals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JodyTJ Posted August 6, 2013 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2013 Jody, what do you think the Catholic and Protestant view of the Godhead is?M.God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Ghost were all the same God, which differs from the LDS view. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finrock Posted August 6, 2013 Report Share Posted August 6, 2013 Good morning JodyTJ. I hope you are having a good day! :)The Holy Ghost is God's life force on earth and guides God's children (us). Also, is Jesus considered a "god" or just God's Son who will reign as King after His second coming?The Holy Ghost is actually a spirit person. It is not just a life force. The "life force" that permeates all of existence, it is what we call the light of Christ, which is different from the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit is an actual person with spirit hands, spirit legs, spirit eyes, etc.Regards,Finrock Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dravin Posted August 6, 2013 Report Share Posted August 6, 2013 God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Ghost were all the same God, which differs from the LDS view.That actually sounds Modalistic (One person with three modes) rather than Trinitarian (three persons of one substance), though that might just be your description rather than your understanding. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just_A_Guy Posted August 6, 2013 Report Share Posted August 6, 2013 Good morning JodyTJ. I hope you are having a good day! :)The Holy Ghost is actually a spirit person. It is not just a life force. The "life force" that permeates all of existence, it is what we call the light of Christ, which is different from the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit is an actual person with spirit hands, spirit legs, spirit eyes, etc.Regards,FinrockIt may be worth noting that even Joseph Smith's understanding of the godhead grew and slightly evolved over time. In the Lectures on Faith, given in 1831-1832, Smith presented the godhead as containing two individuals; God the Father and God the Son (Jesus). The "Holy Spirit" was, as I recall, the manifestation of the combined mind of the Father and the Son. The idea of the Holy Spirit's being a separate "personage of Spirit" with His own identity, came a bit later--during the Nauvoo period, if I remember correctly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JodyTJ Posted August 6, 2013 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2013 That actually sounds Modalistic (One person with three modes) rather than Trinitarian (three persons of one substance), though that might just be your description rather than your understanding.Yeah, that's just a description. Though I should have added, like you said, three persons of one substance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skippy740 Posted August 6, 2013 Report Share Posted August 6, 2013 D&C 130:2222 the father has a body of flesh and bones as tangible as man’s; the son also; but the holy ghost has not a body of flesh and bones, but is a personage of spirit. Were it not so, the holy ghost could not dwell in us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finrock Posted August 6, 2013 Report Share Posted August 6, 2013 Good afternoon Just_A_Guy. I hope you're having a good day! :)It may be worth noting that even Joseph Smith's understanding of the godhead grew and slightly evolved over time. In the Lectures on Faith, given in 1831-1832, Smith presented the godhead as containing two individuals; God the Father and God the Son (Jesus). The "Holy Spirit" was, as I recall, the manifestation of the combined mind of the Father and the Son. The idea of the Holy Spirit's being a separate "personage of Spirit" with His own identity, came a bit later--during the Nauvoo period, if I remember correctly.You're right. We all learn line-upon-line. Here a little, there a little. There is no shame in this.Regards,Finrock Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bytebear Posted August 8, 2013 Report Share Posted August 8, 2013 That actually sounds Modalistic (One person with three modes) rather than Trinitarian (three persons of one substance), though that might just be your description rather than your understanding.I just think of the word "God" as a singular that describes a plural. Like family. Mother, father and child are one family. Father, Son and Holy Ghost are one God. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maureen Posted August 8, 2013 Report Share Posted August 8, 2013 I just think of the word "God" as a singular that describes a plural. Like family. Mother, father and child are one family. Father, Son and Holy Ghost are one God.bytebear, I think your statement is very inspirational.M. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dravin Posted August 8, 2013 Report Share Posted August 8, 2013 (edited) I just think of the word "God" as a singular that describes a plural. Like family. Mother, father and child are one family. Father, Son and Holy Ghost are one God.I understand the Trinity, I may not grok it, but I understand it. I commented because Jody explanation, to me at least, could be read as Modalistic (and was not using the expected Trinitarian language/terms) and that's a fairly common misunderstanding of the Trinity (at least in my limited understanding). It's since been clarified the issue was my reading of the description rather than a misunderstanding of the Trinity. Edited August 8, 2013 by Dravin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maureen Posted August 8, 2013 Report Share Posted August 8, 2013 I understand the Trinity, I may not grok it, but I understand it. I commented because Jody explanation, to me at least, could be read as Modalistic (and was not using the expected Trinitarian language/terms) and that's a fairly common misunderstanding of the Trinity (at least in my limited understanding). It's since been clarified the issue was my reading of the description rather than a misunderstanding of the Trinity.It's true, the Trinity doctrine is very "word" specific. Even though I understand what Jody meant by "same God", it's usually best to keep to the more specific definition, so as not confuse it with modalism.M. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roseslipper Posted August 9, 2013 Report Share Posted August 9, 2013 Ah, that makes more sense. So they're all God, but three separate entities. That does make more sense then the Catholic and Protestant view.yes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaughingMan Posted August 14, 2013 Report Share Posted August 14, 2013 Ah, that makes more sense. So they're all God, but three separate entities. That does make more sense then the Catholic and Protestant view.My Mom thought so too when she was an investigator... she'd investigated and attended nearly every Christian denomination before she met my Father, and none of them appealed to her for various reasons, some of which was the the natures of The Father and The Son and The Holy Ghost. =) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.