Some Irony


Dror

Recommended Posts

Sunday's priesthood lesson in my quorum was about divorce. During the lesson the question popped into my mind, "which of our presidential candidates have been divorced?" When I realized that the Democratic frontrunners have a much better marital track record than the Republican frontrunners (with the exception of Romney), I thought how ironic it is that the Republicans claim to be THE one-and-only family values party.

Don't get me wrong, I don't think that people who have been divorced are bad or don't have family values, or anything like that--I married a divorcee, after all--just that this election is ironic given the Republicans tooting their "family values" horn so much.

Dror

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm an absolute political junkie, I think most people know this. Though I would say politics is probably about the last thing on my mind at sacrament meeting on Sunday. To each their own I guess..

On the the meat of your point though..

I don't think it will really matter. Divorce is so common now that most people don't think anything of it.

I have yet to see people make much an issue over divorces or specifically with Fred Thompson that his current wife is 25 years younger then him.

Posted Image

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't typically spend my Church meetings thinking about politics, either--this is just a thought that popped into my head during Priesthood Meeting.

Nor do I worry about candidates' current or past marital status when deciding who to vote for. However, I am tired of Republicans claiming and defining the values debate when, as far as I can tell, they have no more authority in the matter than the rest of us.

Dror

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm an absolute political junkie, I think most people know this. Though I would say politics is probably about the last thing on my mind at sacrament meeting on Sunday. To each their own I guess..

On the the meat of your point though..

I don't think it will really matter. Divorce is so common now that most people don't think anything of it.

I have yet to see people make much an issue over divorces or specifically with Fred Thompson that his current wife is 25 years younger then him.

Posted Image

I wonder if that's because no one has seen her for months? Or, maybe that's the same picture I've seen over and over and over. Or maybe not. I really can't tell, and I'm not being mean.

However, when she does start to come out in public she had better be wearing professional looking clothes. We've got enough credibility problems already without having a potential First Lady who looks the same in every single photo she takes.

Elphaba

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted Image

Those Hollywood folk do get the babes, do they not? Maybe its time for a hot first lady. Think of the White House parties on Entertainment Tonight!

Yeah, that Family Values stuff is a meaningless catch phrase. I bet Mitt's handlers will have him uttering it at many campaign whistle stops.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Sunday's priesthood lesson in my quorum was about divorce. During the lesson the question popped into my mind, "which of our presidential candidates have been divorced?" When I realized that the Democratic frontrunners have a much better marital track record than the Republican frontrunners (with the exception of Romney), I thought how ironic it is that the Republicans claim to be THE one-and-only family values party.

Don't get me wrong, I don't think that people who have been divorced are bad or don't have family values, or anything like that--I married a divorcee, after all--just that this election is ironic given the Republicans tooting their "family values" horn so much.

Dror

We'll see if it's ironic or not. I'm voting for Romney! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<div class='quotemain'>

Sunday's priesthood lesson in my quorum was about divorce. During the lesson the question popped into my mind, "which of our presidential candidates have been divorced?" When I realized that the Democratic frontrunners have a much better marital track record than the Republican frontrunners (with the exception of Romney), I thought how ironic it is that the Republicans claim to be THE one-and-only family values party.

Don't get me wrong, I don't think that people who have been divorced are bad or don't have family values, or anything like that--I married a divorcee, after all--just that this election is ironic given the Republicans tooting their "family values" horn so much.

Dror

We'll see if it's ironic or not. I'm voting for Romney! :)

Me too!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

pam! you better tell me you love me after that... :sparklygrin:

I'm with Frank...I don't think people pay much attention to candidates marital track records. While it may say something good about them that they've been able to keep a marriage together, I don't think that makes them necessairily better able to run this country.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...