FunkyTown Posted November 12, 2008 Report Posted November 12, 2008 Okay - Let's have a theoretical question. Let's say that we were on a website where someone... Let's call them schmam for this theoretical situation, told people they had to change their color so that someone with the theoretical title of 'schmoderator' could have their favourite color. And let's say this 'Schmoderator' threatened to boot anyone who didn't change their color. Then, let's say that people theoretically asked someone who was well known for adding 'schm' to the beginning of every word to post about it. Would you get a post like this one? Quote
Honor Posted November 12, 2008 Report Posted November 12, 2008 I'd say (theoretically of course) this site is in trouble... That Shmam character should be reprimanded if he/she even existed. Quote
prisonchaplain Posted November 12, 2008 Report Posted November 12, 2008 Perhaps the offended member should contact a Head Schomoderator, offer as much factual information about the schmoderator's offensive schmactions, so that such schmoffenses are handled through the appropriate schmchain of command, rather than being schmaired in public, through cryptic and somewhat questionable schmeans. Just my humble opinion, of course. Quote
Wingnut Posted November 12, 2008 Report Posted November 12, 2008 Exactly what is a "Schmoderator," and why does this Schmam character think they have any schmauthority over my schmolors? Quote
a-train Posted November 12, 2008 Report Posted November 12, 2008 I guess it depends on what color we are theoretically talking about. -a-train Quote
john doe Posted November 12, 2008 Report Posted November 12, 2008 Are you talking about this site? If so, contact a head moderator and we will look at the situation. Quote
Moksha Posted November 12, 2008 Report Posted November 12, 2008 Then, let's say that people theoretically asked someone who was well known for adding 'schm' to the beginning of every word to post about it. Would you get a post like this one? Schmends schmupon schmut schmay schmere schmaying.*with apologies to Scooby Doo Quote
Dr T Posted November 12, 2008 Report Posted November 12, 2008 What if the schmember is a schmoderator too? hmmmm Quote
Palerider Posted November 12, 2008 Report Posted November 12, 2008 I'm so confused... perhaps someone can schmooze it for us....:) Quote
Palerider Posted November 12, 2008 Report Posted November 12, 2008 You had to be there. apparently so...... Quote
Wingnut Posted November 12, 2008 Report Posted November 12, 2008 I'd explain, but it would sound really dumb, instead of funny, so I'll just let the mystery linger in the air... Quote
Palerider Posted November 12, 2008 Report Posted November 12, 2008 I'd explain, but it would sound really dumb, instead of funny, so I'll just let the mystery linger in the air... we are all on the edge of our seats.....:D Quote
RainofGold Posted November 12, 2008 Report Posted November 12, 2008 Are you guys talking in codes because I have no idea what you guys are talking about. If so, how can we break the code? Rain:eek: Quote
mightynancy Posted November 12, 2008 Report Posted November 12, 2008 Code, schmode. This is a schecret combinaschion. Quote
john doe Posted November 12, 2008 Report Posted November 12, 2008 Apparently, someone was abusing their authority. What do you think about that, Pam? Quote
Guest GhostRider Posted November 12, 2008 Report Posted November 12, 2008 (edited) it was pam? I was gonnna say it was Pale, in the library with a candlestick...was i off Edited November 12, 2008 by GhostRider CLUEless moment Quote
Bookmeister Posted November 12, 2008 Report Posted November 12, 2008 *...singing softly to himself...* The schmwheels on the schmbus go schmround and schmround... Quote
Wingnut Posted November 12, 2008 Report Posted November 12, 2008 *...singing softly to himself...* The schmwheels on the schmbus go schmround and schmround...The schbabies on the schmbus go schmaa, schmaa, schmaa... Quote
Honor Posted November 12, 2008 Report Posted November 12, 2008 it was pam?I was gonnna say it was Pale, in the library with a candlestick...was i off Pam? No of course it wasn't Pam. This is THEORETICAL! Quote
Wingnut Posted November 12, 2008 Report Posted November 12, 2008 Pam? No of course it wasn't Pam. This is THEORETICAL! Yeah. It was Schmam. Quote
john doe Posted November 12, 2008 Report Posted November 12, 2008 it was pam?I was gonnna say it was Pale, in the library with a candlestick...was i off Who said it was Pam? I just asked for her opinion of the situation. Quote
Palerider Posted November 13, 2008 Report Posted November 13, 2008 it was pam?I was gonnna say it was Pale, in the library with a candlestick...was i off don't tell anyone its a schsecret......:D Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.