Satan


japacific
 Share

Recommended Posts

Of course he could do good. He has free agency just like we do. But he chooses not to. He makes evil things seem good, but ulitmately has evil intentions:

Moro. 7: 17

17 But whatsoever thing persuadeth men to do evil, and believe not in Christ, and deny him, and serve not God, then ye may know with a perfect knowledge it is of the devil; for after this manner doth the devil work, for he persuadeth no man to do good, no, not one; neither do his angels; neither do they who subject themselves unto him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are all co-eternal with God. We've always had choice.

From D&C 93:

29 Man was also in the beginning with God. Intelligence, or the light of truth, was not created or made, neither indeed can be.

30 All truth is independent in that sphere in which God has placed it, to act for itself, as all intelligence also; otherwise there is no existence.

31 Behold, here is the agency of man, and here is the condemnation of man; because that which was from the beginning is plainly manifest unto them, and they receive not the light.

32 And every man whose spirit receiveth not the light is under condemnation.

Edited by tomk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's interesting to me that as members of the Church we frequently use the phrase "free agency" but when you hear General Authorities speak about it, it's almost always "agency" or "moral agency." It is not free. It came with a price. That of Christ's blood.

(This is not intended as argument or as a "downer" -- just an interesting observation I've made).

Edited by Wingnut
spelling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe there is a little bit of a misunderstanding here. Part of the effects of evil is that one becomes unable to make choice and becomes a soul in “bondage” that has lost the power of agency. Of himself, Satan has lost the power to do good and overcome evil. If it were not for the Atonement of Jesus Christ, we also would lose our agency and power to do good and overcome evil.

The Traveler

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's interesting to me that as members of the Church we frequently use th phrase "free agency" but when you hear General Authorities speak about it, it's almost always "agency" or "moral agency." It is not free. It came with a price. That of Christ's blood.

(This is not intended as argument or as a "downer" -- just an interesting observation I've made).

So true....and "free agency" is not "free" from consequences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe there is a little bit of a misunderstanding here. Part of the effects of evil is that one becomes unable to make choice and becomes a soul in “bondage” that has lost the power of agency. Of himself, Satan has lost the power to do good and overcome evil. If it were not for the Atonement of Jesus Christ, we also would lose our agency and power to do good and overcome evil.

The Traveler

I think this is a great point. Satan has become something "past feeling" he has become the sum total of his many evil choices. There is no going back for him. His course is set and his fate determined as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is a great point. Satan has become something "past feeling" he has become the sum total of his many evil choices. There is no going back for him. His course is set and his fate determined as well.

I had never thought of it that way. So Satan isn't capable of repenting? Interesting thought. I wonder if there are others who are past redeeming as well.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had never thought of it that way. So Satan isn't capable of repenting? Interesting thought. I wonder if there are others who are past redeeming as well.

I have often wondered that as well......I am guessing the one third that were cast out are beyond redemption as well.

Edited by bytor2112
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's interesting to me that as members of the Church we frequently use the phrase "free agency" but when you hear General Authorities speak about it, it's almost always "agency" or "moral agency." It is not free. It came with a price. That of Christ's blood.

(This is not intended as argument or as a "downer" -- just an interesting observation I've made).

Actually for some reason people seem to jump to this meaing of the word free.

Free Agency has to do with Freedom to choose. Thats what Free Agency is. Freedom to choose good or bad. Free angecy has never ment it comes with out a price. I don't know why that meaning of Free is ever used?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is Satan going to hell?

My opinion is not "completely" doctrinal, but I think it makes sense.

There are TWO types of hell:

1 - Physical Place = Telestial Kingdom (which is a Kingdom for those of the lowest degree) and Outer Darkness.

2 - Not being in the presence of God is also hell.

Remember all the times the word "damn" and "damned" appear in the scriptures?

That is because our progression towards our Father in Heaven has stopped and we are "damned" because we aren't able to overcome our own faults, etc. We are forever damned until and unless we take upon ourselves the name of Christ and follow Him.

We may be "damned" to the lower portion of the Celestial Kingdom, or we may be damned to Outer Darkness. All of these are hell to the soul of he who is not living in the presence of our Father.

Hope this makes sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest SisterofJared

Us old-timers will remember well when the term "Free Agency" was used almost exclusively to describe the freedom of choice we all have.... Just as a baseball player might be considered a free agent when he has no current contract, and is free to chose for himself what team he wants to play on.- We are all free to make our own choices.

I grew up hearing the tern Free Agency, and this "moral agency" is really more recent...and I have to confess it drives me a bit nuts to hear someone insisting that it isn't free as in the Value, but is brought with blood... and ignoring the term free as in we are FREE to choose. Some people may have moral agency.... I have free agency! I "mayest" choose for myself!

Sister of Jared

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that we have the freedom to choose. I don't correct anyone when they use the phrase" free agency" and I say it myself sometimes. Personally, I try to say "agency" or "moral agency" more frequently, but I don't think there's anything wrong with the use of the word "free." It was just a personal observation I was making.

(Sorry to hijack the thread.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When we leave the path, or our life is inactiviity, our knowledge begins to recede. Only by returning back to that path, will we be given back what was taken.

That's what they tell you at church, but my experience was that I only learned a few things over and over again in going to church for 23 years. While I was still very active in the church I learned more about its secret history and after gaining much more knowledge on the subject, I then made the decision to leave the church. So I wouldn't my knowledge receded when I left the path. My journey was - gain more knowledge - then leave the path.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share