Jenamarie Posted February 27, 2013 Report Posted February 27, 2013 I've been seeing a lot of political bickering (NOT discussion - bickering -and it's coming from BOTH "sides") going on on this site lately, completely outside of political threads, and it's really destroying the spirit of this place for me.It's not necessary. It's not kind. And, imo, does great harm to the very mission of this forum, as well as being outside of what I would deem to be appropriate behavior for Latter-Day Saints.There is no need for comments meant to make someone feel dumb, or less faithful, or what have you, for their political leanings. Could we just keep political discussions to being political discussions (and not political name-calling), and non-political discussions to being non-political discussions (without the jabs), pwetty pwease? Quote
Guest Posted February 27, 2013 Report Posted February 27, 2013 (edited) If you feel that a post is violating site rules, please report it to the mods by clicking the icon within that post, which will send it to the moderator queue. Edited February 27, 2013 by Eowyn Quote
Backroads Posted February 27, 2013 Report Posted February 27, 2013 It's like election season didn't end. The worst part is I have to bite my tongue (typing fingers?) to keep from joining in. Eowyn's spot-on with how to handle things, but Jenamarie, I agree with the sentiment. Quote
kapikui Posted February 27, 2013 Report Posted February 27, 2013 Well as soon as all of you on the wrong side realize it and admit it, everything will be a lot better. :-) Quote
bytor2112 Posted February 27, 2013 Report Posted February 27, 2013 Leading with a good jab.........followed by a vicious double hook to the liver and then jaw is.......great in boxing. Quote
RipplecutBuddha Posted February 27, 2013 Report Posted February 27, 2013 More than one reason I've given up on any political discussion ever again. How it affects the Spirit is one of the biggest. Quote
Bini Posted February 27, 2013 Report Posted February 27, 2013 I'm one of the black sheep when it comes to political majority here on the forums. I don't even try :) Quote
MarginOfError Posted February 27, 2013 Report Posted February 27, 2013 I'd like to see it end on the boards and in life as well. Before the election I and people I know have been accused of being unchristian and in violation of sacred covenants for my political beliefs and voting practices. This past week, a former member of my ward posted on Facebook that she was glad to not be in a ward with many liberal members because she could teach the lesson she wanted to without the liberals getting offended. The intensity of these discussions keeps escalating and I'm finding myself more and more short tempered when people level those accusations my way. Is it really so difficult to disagree and move on? (I know that's kind of hypocritical coming from me--I'm probably one of the most argumentative people on the forum. But I do make an effort not to tie anyone's political beliefs to their spiritual worthiness. Is that too much to ask in return?) Quote
LittleWyvern Posted February 27, 2013 Report Posted February 27, 2013 Unfortunately, this is a situation where an area's Mormon culture is found going against Mormon doctrine. As long as there is a strong cultural argument in some areas that believing in a certain set (or sets) of political opinions is grounds for an accusation of apostasy, even though such a claim is obviously doctrinally wrong, this issue will continue to pop up (and where did people get the idea that accusing others of apostasy was ever a good thing?). Perhaps the best remedy against this is to realize that we are a global church, and there are no doctrinal matters that only apply to the members of one particular area. Quote
Wingnut Posted February 27, 2013 Report Posted February 27, 2013 (edited) I actually haven't noticed it on here very much. Don't get me wrong -- there's just as much disagreement (and even contention at times) as always, but I haven't noticed much of it being politically-themed, though maybe it's in thread that I'm not participating in. I've seen it a lot on Facebook lately, though -- a lot -- and I've been really hurt by some of the comments that have been thrown my direction, whether intentionally or not. Edited February 27, 2013 by Wingnut added emphasis Quote
Bini Posted February 27, 2013 Report Posted February 27, 2013 I actually haven't noticed it on here very much. Don't get me wrong -- there's just as much disagreement (and even contention at times) as always, but I haven't noticed much of it being politically-themed, though maybe it's in thread that I'm not participating in. I've seen it a lot on Facebook lately, though -- a lot -- and I've been really hurt by some of the comments that have been thrown my direction, whether intentionally or not.There's a few subtle jabs here and there. Quote
skippy740 Posted February 27, 2013 Report Posted February 27, 2013 Jabs can be "okay" in various parts of the forum. In my opinion, the nature of these sub-forums (not that this is an extensive list) should be free of "political" discussion: - Introductions - Marriage & Relationship Advice - Advice Forum - Learn about the Mormon Church The threads in these sub-forums are generally personal in nature, and should be respectful throughout these threads. Political commentary is probably best done in: - General Discussion - Current Events The Preserving Marriage Between a Man and a Woman sub-forum is about preserving marriage, not debating its merits, so I personally don't think it's a good place for political debate. This is only my opinion. Quote
Guest Posted February 27, 2013 Report Posted February 27, 2013 And all I have to say about making jabs, however subtle, is this: If you can't take it, don't dish it out. Quote
selek Posted February 27, 2013 Report Posted February 27, 2013 And all I have to say about making jabs, however subtle, is this: If you can't take it, don't dish it out. Amen and amen!!! Quote
Bini Posted February 27, 2013 Report Posted February 27, 2013 And all I have to say about making jabs, however subtle, is this: If you can't take it, don't dish it out.I agree! Though, I am careful to have never made a political one. Quote
prisonchaplain Posted February 27, 2013 Report Posted February 27, 2013 I'm pretty cautious about expressing political views in public forums. They are divisive, and my calling is more important. The way the political scene is right now, I'd probably be jabbing left, right and center if I did get started (Deep breath, counting to 10...)...yeah, so I won't get started... Quote
Finrock Posted February 27, 2013 Report Posted February 27, 2013 (edited) My wife put up a sign some time ago in our kitchen that reads: "Kindness begins with me" I believe it. My problem is that I don't always know when I'm being unkind. However, I do know that if I want kindness to be the norm, I need to focus on making my own words and behavior kind. Regards, Finrock Edited February 27, 2013 by Finrock grammar Quote
BenRaines Posted February 27, 2013 Report Posted February 27, 2013 I thought that the discussion of politics was forbidden here. Ben Raines Quote
skippy740 Posted February 27, 2013 Report Posted February 27, 2013 Current political candidate discussion is forbidden here... to help preserve 501©3 status for The More Good Foundation. Political ideological discussion is generally allowed. Quote
BenRaines Posted February 27, 2013 Report Posted February 27, 2013 So I am clear we can discuss issues that are to be voted on or bills that are proposed but not candidates? Ben Raines Quote
Anddenex Posted February 27, 2013 Report Posted February 27, 2013 Why are people concerned with "jabs"? I would be more concerned with right or left hooks! Quote
MarginOfError Posted February 27, 2013 Report Posted February 27, 2013 Why are people concerned with "jabs"? I would be more concerned with right or left hooks!It really surprises me that you're being so liberal with your puns. Quote
skippy740 Posted February 28, 2013 Report Posted February 28, 2013 So I am clear we can discuss issues that are to be voted on or bills that are proposed but not candidates?Ben Raines That is my understanding... as long as it sticks to the issues and not a platform to say "Yes on ___" or "No on ___". Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.