Problems with this post include, but are not limited to:
1). The logical fallacy of “affirming the conseqeuent”;
2). Diving headlong into the dubious assumption that “the church” operates in the hereafter as it does in the here-and-now;
3). Trying to treat the Doctrine and Covenants as a legal code whose words are always used in the same way, in order to make hyper-linguistic arguments that lead to bizarre conclusions.