person0

I agree. It is heartbreaking. I wish society hadn't steered so far off course. 😕 I fear we are nearing ripeness, and it could happen faster than one may think.

Possibly. 🤷‍♂️ I drive past it every Sunday on my way to Church; I don't know who lives there. Would you like me to go knock on the door and ask them if they like their house? I've thought about it before, lol.😄

Is it more repulsive than abortion?

I agree that it is too much. The only reason I can support it is because it incentivizes having children when our birth rates are dropping. I actually think we should go in a more specific direction with the goal of reducing abortion rates and increasing marriages, both via financial incentives. Of course, in a perfect world, such things would be unnecessary and not ideal, but our world is very imperfect. 😕

They also stole this from Trump. Vance announced a $5000 credit about two weeks before she said 6k. So, of those three, only the 25k down payment (a terrible idea) is originally hers during this election cycle.

Someone told me the other day that two reasons he typically supports one party over the other are because he is 'pro-choice' and supports the legalization of marijuana. It really just hit me a moment ago that, when reduced to its simplest form, people are choosing someone to lead an entire country primarily based on the premise of wanting consequence-free sex and drugs. How is this the real world? 🫤

Trump reminds me a lot of this guy.

@zil2, Exhibit A:

Perhaps, but I think when looking at the whole thing, it may not. For example: In theory, Biden would have to be one of the underwings that thought to set himself up to rule, but he really didn't; he was just a puppet, ruled and controlled by others. During Trump's first term, he was led, sometimes by bad actors, to make appointments, etc, that he wouldn't now make. I'm not arguing this so much to suggest I believe this theory to be accurate, but more to point to how I think this could live on for many people even in the wake of Trump actually taking office, and actually making a difference for the first few months before being throttled, overturned, etc. On another note, it is entirely possible the prophecy is legit but that human errors and interpolations have made it such that it won't match up but we will get a corrected and revised version after the second coming and be like, "Oh yeah! That's exactly what happened.", haha.

I think that's where I am going. Could it be that eaten simply means that everything they try to do to improve the situation is swallowed up and blocked by bureaucracy such that Trump remains president but his plans don't matter because they are prevented? If so, could that open the door to as much as a Trump 2nd term (possibly shortened somehow), then a Vance 1st term before a period of global control and oppression? Some translations refer to the next two as 'wings that planned to reign'. Could it be something like Trump saying, "I planned to do all these things, but they stopped me" (e.g. he is making and announcing many plans already right now). Perhaps this isn't a viable alternative interpretation, but it seems like it could be. 🤷‍♂️

What do the verses say. Could they be interpreted differently?

I will be very interested to see the outcome of this case.

To the OP. Partisanship aside, I really doubt this matters much at all. Everyone knows at this point that Trump's stream-of-consciousness style of speaking means he often says off-putting and/or inaccurate things that shift based on context. He would just as likely say the exact opposite had he been speaking about someone in the audience who received the Medal of Honor. Those who choose to vote for him (even while 'holding their nose') are unlikely to be sufficiently offput by these remarks to change their decision. Therefore, I declare this analysis a nothing-burger.

People are bringing this up again.

↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑!!!!!