Suzie

Seems to me that perhaps the other person is someone from work however, there are always signs. What about his behavior? Does he receive weird phone calls? Does he tell you that he loves you? What about the way he looks? Did it change recently?

Praetorian, she said he denies it.

Beware of apostasy.

Excuse me? She's my counselor already

I think it's time to release some people from a few callings. These are the people I'm gonna call: Bishop: Suzie (obviousssly) Counselors: Wingnut and MOE Clerk: Skippy Exec Sec: Anddenex EQ Pres: JAG HPGL: Rameumpton Primary Pres: Eowyn RS Pres: Pam Sunday School Pres: JAG (What? He loves callings). YM Pres: Maureen YW Pres: Jenamarie and Backroads.

The fact he no longer wants to be intimate with you it's a huge red flag that he is probably being intimate with someone else. I'm sorry.

Why would he lose all that if he re-marries outside his faith?

MissB, the truth of the matter is that most Bishops are not professional marriage counselors or psychologists or therapists, they are good people trying to help others. In fact, indirectly he acknowledged his own limitations when he suggested counseling and I think he did the right thing. Only you and your husband knows all the little details pertaining your marital problems, the Bishop is just an outsider trying to guide you guys in what to do next and he did exactly that. I'm a firm believer in talking face to face and I think perhaps you should talk with your former Bishop to let him know how you feel about all this, I am quite sure he doesn't know and I am confident he will try to tell you how he saw things at that moment. Perhaps after that conversation, your feelings of anger towards him will disappear.

Well, to be fair we cannot really control how these potential members feel when they see missionaries. If their young girls dream about an American missionary marrying them, is it the Church responsible at all or even the missionary? (of course, if he is not encouraging the whole situation).

As far as I know, babies who are unticked don't have a baggage allowance with Delta and strollers and car seats are not counted as baggage allowance.

It's interesting that you mention this because I was now going to say that I find strange nobody asked so far anything about the child's background, how he looks, if he looks well fed, disabilities, etc. Is it only about treats or food in general? Can you tell us more? Thanks.

I don't know you personally but I can perceive through your posts how you feel about this particular topic. We see it differently I guess and I personally do not feel emotionally attached to it, and before you think I am saying you do...no, I am not saying that, I am just trying to say I try to separate my thoughts from my emotions when discussing topics of this nature. It is indeed, and I never said it wasn't for me. I was trying to make a comment to put everyone at ease since this sort of threads (as you know) usually end up being closed by moderators because the whole "discussion" gets out of hand very quickly.

How exactly this new ruling will cause the destruction of civilization? Or are you just using hyperbole?

I think it was obvious but since you asked: We love drama and controversial topics.

Wow, 5 pages of discussion. Wondering if scripture threads or Church history (sorry I had to say it) get as many and as lengthy responses. Thread about husband cheating wife: 1000000000 views and replies Thread about wife cheating husband: 10000000000000000 views and replies Thread about Mormons and sex: 1000000000000000000000000000000 views and replies Thread about Gays: 100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 views and replies Thread about Deuteronomy, Numbers, Exodus: 2 views, 2 replies

Thanks Skippy, but I'm paying you big bucks to be the data analyst.

I don't think she got in trouble only for the use of the N word but she also got in trouble for the whole plantation wedding idea.

It's not late for me and when I saw the title I thought the exact same thing!

If no one judged me, I would instantly know I am just sleeping and probably having a wonderful dream.

Or...you get a teacher like Suzie and this is real: 1. If you are going offtopic, I tell you. 2. If you are taking all the time and give no chance to others, I tell you. 3. If you are arguing, I tell you. 4. If you are lecturing, I tell you. 5. If you throw a tantrum, I tell you. THE END.

Thanks. I am confident that some sources list Eleanor's marriage to Snow in 1845 and others 1848, I would have to dig a bit to find out. Also I'm pretty sure Mary Elizabeth was actually the younger sister. If Eleanor's marriage to Snow was indeed in 1845, Mary Elizabeth was around 5 years old when the marriage took place.

Geez I was thinking the same thing! I posted mine without reading yours!

Dude, are you related to MOE? But hey, I want one of those analysis for myself. Geez, I feel like I am sinning...sounds like a palm reading session or something.

Interesting, didn't President Snow also married Sarah's sister? Sarah was certainly not the youngest wife of Lorenzo. IF I am not mistaken, Eleanor was his youngest wife ( she was 14).

One of the first things that strike me about your post was your username "badgirl". You are not a bad girl or woman. You're going through a very difficult time in your life and marriage. I don't know your husband's side of the story but it seems to me that he has been cheating on you (or so it seems), he also seems determined for you not to get hired because he probably doesn't want you to leave him. You are the only one that can decide what is best for you, do you guys have children together?