mordorbund

In that moment, all of Tautology Club knew they made the right choice.

A bridge… over troubled waters

Tell me you want @zil2to send you a fountain pen without telling me you want zil to send you a fountain pen.

Tell me you want @zil2to send you a fountain pen without telling me you want zil to send you a fountain pen.

Got curious. There is a talk by that title, in that conference, by Elder Peter F, Meurs (70).  No corn of any sort is mentioned in it. Nor anything remotely like what the AI dreamed up.  Are you sure you didn't accidentally get the LSD AI?

In the US that directive is called a living will.
The Church uses strong language against euthanasia (violates the commandments of God) but notes that what you describe is not euthanasia. Here’s the relevant section in the Handbook of Instruction:
 

In the US that directive is called a living will.
The Church uses strong language against euthanasia (violates the commandments of God) but notes that what you describe is not euthanasia. Here’s the relevant section in the Handbook of Instruction:
 

In the US that directive is called a living will.
The Church uses strong language against euthanasia (violates the commandments of God) but notes that what you describe is not euthanasia. Here’s the relevant section in the Handbook of Instruction:
 

In the US that directive is called a living will.
The Church uses strong language against euthanasia (violates the commandments of God) but notes that what you describe is not euthanasia. Here’s the relevant section in the Handbook of Instruction:
 

In the US that directive is called a living will.
The Church uses strong language against euthanasia (violates the commandments of God) but notes that what you describe is not euthanasia. Here’s the relevant section in the Handbook of Instruction:
 

In the US that directive is called a living will.
The Church uses strong language against euthanasia (violates the commandments of God) but notes that what you describe is not euthanasia. Here’s the relevant section in the Handbook of Instruction:
 

In the US that directive is called a living will.
The Church uses strong language against euthanasia (violates the commandments of God) but notes that what you describe is not euthanasia. Here’s the relevant section in the Handbook of Instruction:
 

Been a while since I saw that.

And then there’s this 

You forgot to include quotation marks.
”Children are entitled to birth within the bonds of matrimony, and to be reared by a father and a mother who honor marital vows with complete fidelity.”
This backlash comes with prophetic warning:
 

And then there’s this 

I've yet to meet anyone in real life or even on most of the internet who is truly against the two-parent home and a stable family.
I think where the generalized left wing is struggling here is trying to defend the situations without two-parents. Some years ago I read an article about a study where they were trying to prove that single mothers are raising boys than married mothers are. Apparently some journalist dared to ask the person over the study about her happy stable marriage to her children's father and it didn't go over very well.
I think people want the single parent to be "just as good". And I know some excellent single parents who give it their all and do a fine job. 
I just don't think that cry needs to be louder than "two-parent families are a good norm and goal". 

Not exactly. However, we have two papers that cover most of the issues: one on sexuality (homosexuality, gender identity, purity, etc.) and another on domestic violence. You may be aware that most Evangelicals (including AoG) believe that in the life to come we will love all of our brothers and sisters more than we currently love our family members but that we will not marry or give in marriage.

And then there’s this 

And then there’s this 

You forgot to include quotation marks.
”Children are entitled to birth within the bonds of matrimony, and to be reared by a father and a mother who honor marital vows with complete fidelity.”
This backlash comes with prophetic warning:
 

And then there’s this 

You forgot to include quotation marks.
”Children are entitled to birth within the bonds of matrimony, and to be reared by a father and a mother who honor marital vows with complete fidelity.”
This backlash comes with prophetic warning:
 

And then there’s this 

Why not go for broke?  I predict1:
North Korea, Vatican City, Iran, and Israel.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1That it won't be any of these.