mrrellim Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 Forgive me if this has been covered in the forums before, but I am not getting any results for anything I search for. I remember as a teenager reading the History of the Church, you know the big blue hard covered books and there was like 15 or 16 books in the set, and I seem to remember reading that Joseph Smith, along with a lot of the other church leaders, belonged to the Free Mason organization. Now, when ever I mention this to any other members most of the say that a Church Leader would never belong to such an evil organization. So, am I just imagining that the Church History books said this. Now, I'm not looking for or want a discussion on whether the Temple Ceremony was stolen from the masons (that could be a different topic) but just for whether Joseph Smith was a mason. Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deseretgov Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 Yes he was. Masons is not an evil organization. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Palerider Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 Since you don't seem to remember....check out this link,....The Mormon Temple Ceremony and Mormon Temples: Temples, Mormons and Masons - The Authentic Ancient Nature of the LDS Temple Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pam Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 Why Did Joseph Smith Become a Mason?Comments by Elder John A. Witsoe concerning this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rampion Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 (edited) Yes, Joseph Smith was a Mason. And so were, possibly, the people in the mob that killed him. They were angry and felt threatened and probably felt that they had good reason. We know who was leading them. The Masons do a lot of good though, and we are told that we are to judge things by their fruits. Some of the older Masons, at least in Utah, remember having ill feelings towards the Mormons, but we can't judge a whole group by the actions of a few. Now they are welcoming and accepting, and there are Masons who are also Mormons. It's possible that the Masons served God's purpose and helped to preserve much of the temple ordinances. Their history goes back to the temple of Soloman. But the gospel was taken from the earth, so the Masons didn't remember the entire significance of what they had. Edited August 3, 2009 by rampion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glow_inthe_dark_girl Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 yes. as were the first 4 presidents. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prisonchaplain Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 (edited) My experience is that LDS are far more accepting of Free Masonry than we evangelicals. Secret Societies Edited August 3, 2009 by prisonchaplain add link Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Alana Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 When I think of Masons I think 'ohh cool.' The phrase 'the more I learn the more I realize I don't know' seems to be applicable more and more lately, but it's more 'the older I get the more I realize I don't know.' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Godless Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 My experience is that LDS are far more accepting of Free Masonry than we evangelicals. Secret SocietiesActually, there are multiple discourses in the Book of Mormon that condemn "secret combinations". Whether or not the Freemasons fall into that category is certainly debatable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Misshalfway Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 I have always had a favorable view of Free Masons and that their "secretive" practices were rather benign...... not that I really understand their purpose. While I do remember a few members describing them as evil, I think I was taught that this perception was an over reaction. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FunkyTown Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 My experience is that LDS are far more accepting of Free Masonry than we evangelicals. Secret SocietiesIronic, considering the warnings in the Book of Mormon specifically about secret combinations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Misshalfway Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 Ironic, considering the warnings in the Book of Mormon specifically about secret combinations.Why does everything have to get labeled "black or white"? Can't it just be off? I guess I am just wondering why we sometimes characterize something as "black" just because it doesn't have enough white. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beefche Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 I'm going to guess that Mormons are more accepting of Masons as a secretive society because we understand due to our temple rites. If we condemn them for having "secrets", then we are being very hypocritical considering many consider our temple ceremonies as secret. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Misshalfway Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 Yes. I mean "secret" doesn't always mean "dark and evil". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FunkyTown Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 Yes. I mean "secret" doesn't always mean "dark and evil".All I'm sayin' is that the book of Mormon doesn't warn against 'Secret combinations so long as they're not of the light and nice variety'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Misshalfway Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 Lol, Funky. I hear ya. Just can't paint it with as broad a brush as you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dazed-and-confused Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 At what point do we determine something ia a bad secret society, aside from the obvious human sacrifice groups...LOL....but i mean if we have to sign a non-disclosure contract at work, does that not now constitute a secret society? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beefche Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 How many things are really secret? The LDS temple ceremony can be found on the internet. I'm sure if I looked, I could find the Mason stuff as well. I know that gangs (you know, of the bad variety) have some really secret things. In watching investigative shows, they discuss how difficult it is for police agencies to infiltrate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarginOfError Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 All I'm sayin' is that the book of Mormon doesn't warn against 'Secret combinations so long as they're not of the light and nice variety'. Actually, the Book of Mormon does sort of explain what makes a ‘good secret combination’ and what makes a ‘bad secret combination.’ The key seems to be in why they are keeping the secrets. All of the secret combinations condemned in the Book of Mormon were focused on gaining power, influence, and wealth. They also insisted that the secrets be kept on penalty of death.The Masons, on the other hand, are a group that, to my knowledge, as never put anyone to death for discussing their rights. What’s more, they are a group devoted to community service and humility. I think the “by their fruits ye shall know them” test applies here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KrazyKay Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 MarginofError, Thank you... you put into words exactly what I was thinking as I was reading this thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest SmarterBlue Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 If Joseph Smith was a freemason and that doesn’t change my opinion of him at all. There are a lot of people who were freemasons such as Theodore Roosevelt, George Washington, and Harry S. Truman (one of my favorite political figures) just to name a few. I tend to view it as more of a period thing where he have joined to network, which was not uncommon at the time, or even (heaven forbid) introduce people to the Book of Mormon . I really don’t buy into any conspiracy theories with regards to Joseph Smith as a freemason, and if by chance we found out by chance the Grand Mason owed some back taxes that in no way reflects other members of the freemason community. If I drink (insert your favorite flavor here) soda, and we find out the CEO made some terrible marketing decisions, that in no way reflects me as the consumer – except that they may find a surplus of stock on Wal-Mart shelves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FunkyTown Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 Actually, the Book of Mormon does sort of explain what makes a ‘good secret combination’ and what makes a ‘bad secret combination.’ The key seems to be in why they are keeping the secrets. All of the secret combinations condemned in the Book of Mormon were focused on gaining power, influence, and wealth. They also insisted that the secrets be kept on penalty of death.The Masons, on the other hand, are a group that, to my knowledge, as never put anyone to death for discussing their rights. What’s more, they are a group devoted to community service and humility. I think the “by their fruits ye shall know them” test applies here.If that were the case, that would mean I would be wrong, Moe! How can that be, I?I'm not actually married to the idea of Mason's being bad. I just thought it was funny that the LDS church doesn't condemn a group that most would consider to fit the 'Secret Combinations' bill pretty perfectly. My Grandpa was a mason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just_A_Guy Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 Ironically, one of Joseph Smith's plural wives was Lucinda Morgan--widow of the victim of the most notorious (alleged) Masonic murder in American history. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just_A_Guy Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 I'm not sure whether Masonry (either Scottish or York Rite) can properly be classified as a "secret combination" when both its general membership and its guiding principles are openly acknowledged. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saguaro Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 There's an interesting podcast on Mormon Stories about Masonry and the temple, it's an interview with a guy who is a current Mason and a member of the church. It's podcast number 005.Multimedia & Writing Archive | Mormon Stories Podcast Archive Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.