Countdown to presidential election begins


Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Phoenix_person said:

In a word: Palestine. A lot of leftists (and maybe even some liberals) who reluctantly voted for Biden 4 years ago now have a very concrete reason to not do so again, barring a radical change in the US approach to the Gaza conflict in the coming months.

I see it totally differently. People like us (strong opinions, passionate) are always more likely to vote against than for. You won’t vote for Biden, you’ll vote strictly against Trump. The right does the same thing.

 

What does your side fear more? Israel or Trump 2.0?

Edited by LDSGator
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm also seeing an awful lot of anti-Biden stuff from the left.  Some of it is downright antisemitic, but most of it is plain old anger at Biden for siding with Israel, not doing enough to pressure them to stop operations in Gaza, and not doing enough to get help to the Palestinians. 

Biden criticism seems to be occurring at every pro-Palestinian protest.  These folks ain't exactly MAGA Trumpers: https://uscpr.org/oct-2023-protests/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Phoenix_person said:

You sure about that? 😬

230906-hillary-clinton-se-501p-5a9732.thumb.jpg.1e36770b1a54ace3dcf7bec947fb832d.jpg

Lol! That’s awesome. 
 

But this isn’t 2016. I’m convinced that Trumps capital riot, whining about stolen elections and criminal indictments will energize your base and they’ll come out in droves. It’ll also push the last few moderates out there (both of them) to Bidens side. 

Edited by LDSGator
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/16/2024 at 12:52 PM, LDSGator said:

What’s the best definition of insanity? Doing the same thing again and again and expecting different results.

If people believed this, we would have no pianists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Vort said:

If people believed this, we would have no pianists.

Yeah, I don’t see it that way. I practice the “same” kicks every day obsessively, and each individual kick is different. Maybe higher, maybe lower, maybe weaker, maybe stronger. Also, even the best pianist makes mistakes, so it’s actually not doing the same thing again and again. 

Edited by LDSGator
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/16/2024 at 1:52 PM, LDSGator said:

The issue the right has is that, even if I’m dead wrong, millions of Americans agree with me. So if the right was a little wiser, they’d drop the stolen election rants and focus on winning issues.

Do you hear yourself? "Even if the election actually was stolen, it's a losing issue for Republicans, so they should quit bringing it up."

Are we as a nation truly so cynical and jaded that we would accept such a thing? "The issue of our fundamental freedoms doesn't poll well, so let's change the message."

I am sure there was widespread fraud in the election, as there probably has been for at least twenty years, likely longer. I am absolutely sure that absentee and mail-in ballots are insecure, and have little doubt that's why the Democrats push for them so hard. I do not know if such fraud actually changed the election outcome. I choose to believe it did not, because if it did, we're screwed. But to say that we shouldn't talk about the issue because it doesn't poll well is breathtaking, and not in a good way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LDSGator said:

Yeah, I don’t see it that way. I practice the “same” kicks every day obsessively, and each individual kick is different. Maybe higher, maybe lower, maybe weaker, maybe stronger. Also, even the best pianist makes mistakes, so it’s actually not doing the same thing again and again. 

If that's the case, then how can you think that Trump vs. Biden 2024 is "the same thing" as Trump vs. Biden 2020?

(I didn't see that TFP had already made the same observation immediately after your post. If I had seen that, I would not have made the comment. Another lesson to me about how I should read the whole thread before responding. But it's not my fault that I don't learn. If the list gods wanted me to learn, they wouldn't keep giving me the same ineffectual lesson. They must be insane.)

Edited by Vort
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Vort said:

Do you hear yourself? "Even if the election actually was stolen, it's a losing issue for Republicans, so they should quit bringing it up."

Are we as a nation truly so cynical and jaded that we would accept such a thing? "The issue of our fundamental freedoms doesn't poll well, so let's change the message."

I am sure there was widespread fraud in the election, as there probably has been for at least twenty years, likely longer. I am absolutely sure that absentee and mail-in ballots are insecure, and have little doubt that's why the Democrats push for them so hard. I do not know if such fraud actually changed the election outcome. I choose to believe it did not, because if it did, we're screwed. But to say that we shouldn't talk about the issue because it doesn't poll well is breathtaking, and not in a good way.

I hear myself just fine. Frankly I think I make great points.
 

You keep beating the “They stole the election” horse. It’s absolutely what voters want to hear  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LDSGator said:

You keep beating the “They stole the election” horse.

Where have I ever even mentioned the issue before? I mean ever, in any thread? Maybe I have, but I don't remember ever having done so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Vort said:
4 hours ago, LDSGator said:

You keep beating the “They stole the election” horse.

Where have I ever even mentioned the issue before? I mean ever, in any thread? Maybe I have, but I don't remember ever having done so.

To be fair, it's just a rhetorical device @LDSGator's employing. Not a particularly good one one. But it's not that he's literally saying "you" have been beating that horse. But that it, generally, has been beaten repeatedly. As I pointed out earlier, for people running for office, perhaps, this is a political strategy, but to imply that those suggesting it's an issue on this forum are using it as a political strategy to gather more voters to their cause is pretty off-based.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Just_A_Guy said:

Looks like I’ll be writing in President Nelson again in November (assuming he’s still alive, of course . . .)

I always thought writing in a vote or going third party was an ego trip. It still is-but I’ll probably do the same.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, LDSGator said:

I always thought writing in a vote or going third party was an ego trip. It still is-but I’ll probably do the same.  

To some degree it probably is; but I believe God will send us better candidates when we show we want them and refuse to embrace the openly-amoral, proudly visionless libertines that the abortionists or the “beer, babes, burps ‘n’ brawls” wing of the GOP serve up to us.  Naive, I know . . .

A certain forum member back in 2016-ish got really mad when I cited 1 Kings 19:18 and likened it to Trump; but that’s still pretty much where I am.  If the GOP thinks they need my vote, they know where to find me.  

Edited by Just_A_Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Just_A_Guy said:

To some degree it probably is; but I believe God will send us better candidates when we show we want them and refuse to embrace the openly-amoral libertines that the abortionists or the “beer, babes, burps ‘n’ brawls” wing of the GOP serve up to us.  Naive, I know . . .

A certain forum member back in 2016-ish got really mad when I cited 1 Kings 19:18 and likened it to Trump; but that’s still pretty much where I am.  If the GOP thinks they need my vote, they know where to find me.  

In junior high we had a mock election for Clinton vs Bush. A mom of the one of the students wrote a four page rant about she could never vote for Bush because he wasn’t 100% pro life. I remember asking the teacher how voting for someone who had no chance of winning would further the pro life cause. He agreed with me. I was such a snotty little kid, but I was right about that one. Since then, I’ve always thought that going third party was done for your own pleasure. To show off how you don’t get your hands dirty like the scumbag peasants.  And to feed a superiority complex.
 

I should know, I have a massive superiority complex!   

Edited by LDSGator
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Just_A_Guy said:

the GOP thinks they need my vote, they know where to find me.  

Missed this part. The Trumpers need every single GOP vote they can get, but I’m not sure they understand that. They don’t seem to want to build bridges, even in their own party. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LDSGator said:

In junior high we had a mock election for Clinton vs Bush. A mom of the one of the students wrote a four page rant about she could never vote for Bush because he wasn’t 100% pro life. I remember asking the teacher how voting for someone who had no chance of winning would further the pro life cause. He agreed with me. I was such a snotty little kid, but I was right about that one. Since then, I’ve always thought that going third party was done for your own pleasure. To show off how you don’t get your hands dirty like the scumbag peasants.  And to feed a superiority complex.

I don't agree with the cynicism. But.... I used to think more like @Just_A_Guy re not voting for someone who wasn't legitimately "good" (as if that exists in politics) even if it meant throwing away my vote. Since I've gotten more into politics and whatnot I've changed my tune quite a bit. I now see it as a very simple equation. There's a good-ish side (with bad, flawed people running), and a truly evil and awful side (with bad, flawed people running), and it's as simple as that. And that's not to say there are mistaken approaches/policies on the good-ish side or that all the approaches/policies on the truly evil and awful side are straight up evil. But in broad strokes, it's pretty plain. One side's going to destroy freedom, promote sexual corruption, tax it's citizenry to oblivion, destroy the economy, and murder babies gleefully. The other side stands against those things, on the whole.

I would, in a heartbeat, have voted for DeSantos or Ramaswamy instead of Trump. And if there were a truly, legitimately, righteous man/woman running... I'd happily vote for them. But that's not an option.  It's (likely) Trump or Biden. That's the choice. "Neither" isn't an option.

I'm reminded of when we give our kids a choice on something. "You can pick up your toys or you can go to your room," and they try and choose neither. Nope. Sorry. That's not the option. You pick up you toys or you go to your room. By choosing neither, you choose your room because that's the alternate for not picking up your toys.

Obviously it's not really the same thing. And for someone in Utah voting.... well your vote's pretty meaningless (at this point) anyhow because Trump will win Utah. So I'm not really against people choosing to vote otherwise on "principle", per se, unless they live in a so-called "swing state". But as for myself.... I simply see the reality of it. You can pick up your toys or go to your room. So I'll pick up my toys.

Edited by The Folk Prophet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share