have any of you had a child in your 40's?


Recommended Posts

Posted

I wouldn't care about any societal feelings for having a baby after age 40. I would be concerned about my own health, the health of the baby, and that when that baby is an adult, I'll be getting on in years and likely have to rely on that child to care for me.  I am not sure I could handle the physical parts of being pregnant at age 40 nor the physical requirements of caring for a baby and toddler in my 40's or 50's. 

I don't care if I would feel out of place around new mothers who are in their 20s. Friends are friends whether in the same stage of life as I or not. 

Posted
18 minutes ago, summer said:

Is 40 something too old to have another baby? Especially with all of the young LDS moms I wonder how out of place I would feel?

No, not if your dr and you decide that it is safe to do. Pregnancies can be higher risk for someone in their 40's, but if your up for it go for it.

Posted

I'm 52 and my youngest is 12, so I hit your question on the head (only from the dude perspective).  It's young enough that when they reach their milestones you still as, "Where'd the time go?  Weren't you a toddler last week?"  Females may feel a little more pressure than us dudes, but people are pushing well into their 40s for childbearing these days.

Posted
1 hour ago, prisonchaplain said:

 people are pushing well into their 40s for childbearing these days.

It also helps that modern medicine has made this lesser of a risk than it was even as soon as only 30 years ago...

 

Posted

Depending on whom you ask, somewhere around 38 to 45 is where the risk of Down's Syndrome (and some other genetic anomalies) begin to rise significantly.  So, take that for what it's worth.

  • 6 months later...
Posted

Pffft my next daughter will be born when I'm 43.  We also tentatively hope to have one more after that.  (My wife is about 10 years younger than I.) 

Out of place?  Hah.  I'm a Mormon with 6 kids and live in a state consisting mostly of Catholics.  I'm as average as it gets in that department.

Posted

My mom was 41 when she had me. I have to admit, there have been times that it really stinks to have parents that much older. 

Posted

I was 43 when my last child was born. It's a different, more painful :) parenting experience, but certainly rewarding. Gives me a chance to try and fail again to exhibit those fatherly virtues I failed so badly to master as a younger father.

Posted
33 minutes ago, Vort said:

It's a...more painful :) parenting experience...

Honestly curious here... How so? Just harder to chase the youngsters with arthritis in the knees?

Posted
1 hour ago, The Folk Prophet said:

Honestly curious here... How so? Just harder to chase the youngsters with arthritis in the knees?

Yes, and just keeping up in general when your body chemistry sort of slows you down. Having children in your 40s doesn't so much keep you young as force you to keep acting like you're young.

Guest LiterateParakeet
Posted
5 hours ago, Vort said:

Yes, and just keeping up in general when your body chemistry sort of slows you down. Having children in your 40s doesn't so much keep you young as force you to keep acting like you're young.

LOL, so true. I had my last child when I was 40, and I agree. :)  

Posted

I would think it would be between you and your doctor. However, if you do get looks at church, assume it is envy because it certainly would be on my part. I try not to be covetous of babies but it's so hard.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...