• Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    mrmarklin got a reaction from Vort in How will you follow the Prophet’s Counsel?   
    Because according to the US constitution, there is a bill of rights. Abridging things such as church attendance, or any peaceful assembly is specifically prohibited. Where, except in a politician’s feeble brain, is the government’s right to mandate me doing anything I don’t want to do in this phony emergency?
  2. Like
    mrmarklin reacted to mikbone in Utah Gasoline Prices Are Ridiculous   
    Come to California.  It will make you feel much better.
  3. Like
    mrmarklin got a reaction from Vort in How will you follow the Prophet’s Counsel?   
    Because according to the US constitution, there is a bill of rights. Abridging things such as church attendance, or any peaceful assembly is specifically prohibited. Where, except in a politician’s feeble brain, is the government’s right to mandate me doing anything I don’t want to do in this phony emergency?
  4. Like
    mrmarklin reacted to Just_A_Guy in How will you follow the Prophet’s Counsel?   
    What on earth do you mean?  Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.
  5. Like
    mrmarklin reacted to The Folk Prophet in How will you follow the Prophet’s Counsel?   
    Frankly, what concerns me the most is the astounding, condescending holier-than-thou comments I'm seeing from so many people that really ought to know better and be better at showing love, compassion, understanding, and empathy to their fellow Saints. And with the latest message from the First Presidency they've now added a distinct air of over-the-top smug "I told you so"-ism to their condescending holier-than-thou-ness. I know, and fully understand, that I've been accused of holier-than-thou attitudes. At times these criticisms are legitimate. Sure. But I don't think I've ever called my fellow Saints murderers because they had reservations about some medicine or another. I don't think I've ever phrased things in terms of "I'm begging you with all the love and patience I have left to let go of your pride" or the like.
    I guess my own reservations about the vaccine and my own disdain for masking has helped me find some balance here. We ought to follow the prophet. We also ought to show more love and understanding for those who think differently than us. It seems that, one way or another, we're all failing. Even as I write this I realize that my love, compassion, understanding, and empathy for those calling me a murderer for not having been vaccinated sooner is sorely lacking.
    We all have a long way to go to reach Zion.
    (Most of the rhetoric I've seen on this forum hasn't been that extreme, but sometimes does tend to touch on some of the problems I believe are occurring. So kudos....and shame on us too. )
  6. Like
    mrmarklin reacted to mikbone in How will you follow the Prophet’s Counsel?   
    I find it curious that we are treating COVID-19 like it is one of the ten plagues.  
    This will pass.  
    There are horrible atrocities occurring in the world on an ongoing basis that don’t even get any play time on prime time news.
    “there it is”
  7. Like
    mrmarklin reacted to mikbone in Perhaps one of the greatest lessons in my life.   
    Depends, if you are saying they both perform excellent quality work.
    I would ask for references, call and speak with the prior customers.  See if there were unexpected delays or expenses.  
    I would then compare the quotes.  If they are similar I would go with the guy with the initials.
    Doubt your scenario ever happened.  The scenarios that I described happen all day every day…
  8. Like
    mrmarklin reacted to mikbone in Perhaps one of the greatest lessons in my life.   
    Well unfortunately it is just not that easy.  
    The point that you emphasized with underline and bold is a judgment call.  How do you determine the point where no additional benefit is achieved?
    I'll give you an example.
    If you break a tibia the acceptable alignment (according to what will be considered malpractice) allows 5 degrees of angulation in the frontal plant, 10 degrees of anterior or posterior angulation in the lateral plane, 50% cortical apposition, < 1 cm of shortening, and < 10 deg of rotational malalignment.  
    If you are within those boundaries you will not get sued, and the patient will likely have a good result (especially if they are childern [who have awesome remodeling capabilities] or the elderly and people who are low demand - less active)  But if you are a healthy active adult any malalignment can be problematic.  Most people would prefer to have anatomic alignment of their bones.  And they do notice. 
    My goal is to put every fracture back into anatomic alignment.  Even if they are low demand.  If you train and practice meticulous skills on all your cases you will have better results with those cases when you need to be more accurate.
    And there are many ways to fix a tibia.  You can use a cast, plate and screws, an external fixator, or an intramedullary nail.  There are benefits and disadvantages to each technique.  
    If I broke my tibia I'd want it fixed with a nail by a surgeon with meticulous skills and expectations.  
    If it is done with poor skill, the surgeon will probably tell you to stay off of the extremity for 2 months to allow it to heal.  If it is done correctly the surgeon can allow you to start full weight-bearing as soon as the patient is comfortable.  
    It would be nice if everyone did their best.  Unfortunately in our society, people cut corners all the time.  And some people are just sloppy. 
  9. Like
    mrmarklin reacted to mikbone in Perhaps one of the greatest lessons in my life.   
    That is one way to look at it.
    The other perspective distinguishes the average worker from true craftsmanship.
    Take embroidery for example. The easy way to tell if someone is an expert is to actually turn the piece of work over and look at the backside.  There are some artisans that can even perform double sided embroidery.
    I cant tell you how many times I have looked at x-rays from work of other surgeons and thought to myself.  
    What the (heck) were you thinking?
  10. Like
    mrmarklin reacted to mikbone in Perhaps one of the greatest lessons in my life.   
    Sufficient and acceptable are pretty hazy terms.
    As an orthopedic surgeon I do work all the time that nobody but myself can appreciate.  For example I routinely replace the proximal femur in patient that break their hip with a metal prosthesis.  
    There is a huge difference between what is acceptable vs. my best.  The hardware vendors and scrub techs try to convince me all the time to put in hardware that makes the case easier and quicker.  
    I know that spending an extra 10 minutes to properly cement the prosthesis and perform a water tight layered closure will give the patient a better implant.  And even if the patient has dementia or is minimally active I always do my best.
    My x-rays look good.  And I appreciate that they look good, even if the patient and family cant even understand what I did.
    I could go on and on.
    And, for sure its not just you.  The majority of people are satisfied with sufficient or even sub-standard work.  I see it all day long…
  11. Like
    mrmarklin reacted to laronius in Efficiency is good, but not at Church?   
    At some point the church stopped receiving tithing in kind. If that wasn't for efficiency's sake I don't know what it was. 
  12. Like
    mrmarklin reacted to Carborendum in Critical Race Theory - Someone (liberal) please explain   
    John Birchers??? Those communists!!!
  13. Like
    mrmarklin reacted to Just_A_Guy in Critical Race Theory - Someone (liberal) please explain   
    Indeed; redlining has been illegal since the late 1960s.  I can *sort of* see the argument that white middle class folks from better neighborhoods were able to leave their kids with a bigger inheritance which percolates down to the present day.  On the other hand, speaking anecdotally:  my parents inherited very little on their own parents’ deaths, and what they did inherit was after they were well-established in life.  The “inheritance” that really matters is cultural—a stable trauma-free childhood, two parents in the home who are both engaged in their children’s care and upbringing, and inculcation of values like respect for authority and delayed gratification and resilience and planning for the future.  
    I would acknowledge that there are still stereotypes and influences out there that mean that all other things being equal, a black person probably has to work somewhat harder to get ahead in life than a whole person does.  But don’t think that skin tone alone permanently hamstrings a black person’s ambitions in the way the critical race theorists want me to think that it does.  Rejection of traditional American cultural values that critical race theorists pooh-pooh as “whiteness”—the stuff in that infamous Smithsonian infographic, for example; like nuclear families and property rights and rational, linear thinking and independence and self-reliance and scientific method and politeness and ability to keep to a schedule and clarity in speaking and writing and judging people by their intent as well as the results of their actions (—rejection of those ideals will set you back; in any society, no matter what color your skin is.  
  14. Like
    mrmarklin reacted to estradling75 in First Responders   
    In prepping and 2nd amendment circles there is a saying... "When seconds count... the police (or other first responders) are minutes away."
    I have every respect for our First Responders, but there is a lot to be said about the idea of being able to correctly resolve issues or at least keep them from getting worse until the pros can get there and do their thing.  But that would require many people to really know what they are doing
  15. Like
    mrmarklin reacted to Vort in No more Priesthood/RS General Session   
    I'm sad that I have lost my chance to take my boys to a General Priesthood Meeting.
  16. Like
    mrmarklin reacted to The Folk Prophet in Faith vs Knowledge   
    I thought I'd weigh in as the study of faith has been a pet pursuit of mine and I have what I like to think of as insight into it.
    First, "faith" is often conflated with "belief". But they're not the same thing. We are commanded to believe. That is its own principle. We are also commanded to have faith. That is a different principle. In point of fact, believing is an act of faith. But so is the following of all council and command. In fact having faith is an act of faith.
    The best word to describe faith that I've come up with is "commitment". So why not just say commitment? Well, because faith contains the idea that it is without a sure knowledge. It is a commitment to despite sure knowledge. I think that's  the best way I've come up with understanding it. We could also use terms like loyalty, belief in*, dedication to, etc., and they are all tied together.
    *"Belief" or "belief in" can be synonymous with faith if one understands that to mean something more than simply "believing they exist" but actually believing in as in trusting in, committed to the idea of, dedicated to the reality of, etc. So despite the fact that I started by saying faith is conflated with belief and they're not the same, I must confess that what I really mean is that I think most people tend to conflate the complexity of faith with the simplicity of "I believe that God exists", which isn't faith at all -- as clearly demonstrated by the fact that Satan himself believes God exists, and yet clearly has no faith in Him. But believing that God has power to save, loves us, has all power, all knowledge, will keep His word, etc., etc... well that's a more complex idea that ties in more directly with the idea of faith...but... one can believe in all those things and still abandon their commitment to God, and thereby show no faith.
    When I was a kid I would often look at Hebrews 11:1 thinking it was a definitional statement of faith. But I think it's pretty clear that it is not. It's simply saying that faith (commitment) is the substance of (reason for) things hoped for. Or in other words, we have hope because of faith. That's not defining faith.
    The same thing with "If ye have faith ye hope for things which are not seen, which are true". Not a definition. Just  a statement of logic and reality.
    Yes. (Depending on what you mean by "greater than"). More important in this life? Yes.
    That probably depends on the receiver and what impacts them more.
    Not if we know something. Why would it be improper to say we know something if we know something, and who are you to claim those saying they know something don't really know it?
    Yes. More so that witnessing something with our own eyes. Much more so.
    I think the third. Faith isn't knowledge or belief. It exists alongside those things. But I think it's a mistake to suggest that saying "I know X..." is inherently flawed. It's not. But the idea that one shouldn't say "I know" if they don't has some validity. If one means "I trust in and am committed to despite not knowing" then that might be the better thing to say. Maybe.
    Yes. Moreso.
    Considering color blindness, the way light works, and examples of "the blue dress or the white dress" etc., I'd say your suggestion that sight is the most reliable is quite flawed.
    Seeing God face to face has nothing to do with faith.
    I would directly you to the examples of Laman and Lemuel who experienced direct interactions with God and angels and still did not have faith.
    I would also direct you to a myriad of examples of people who've had countless spiritual experiences but then fall away and leave the church. Because they lacked faith.
    Testimony is not faith. A witness is the witnessing of. That is all. If one has had an experience, one can testify they've had it. That doesn't mean they trust it, believe it, don't deny it ever, don't turn their backs on it, etc., etc.
    Seeing God face to face doesn't ensure anything but further damnation for the wicked.
    I think "seen" here isn't meaning literally with the eyes. It strikes me it's more generic. When you know, you know. When you have faith your are committed to, despite not knowing fully. When you know fully, you probably (and this is my best reasoning on the matter) don't need "faith" any more because you then have commitment with full understanding, and I think faith (at least per these scriptures) is being defined as commitment without full understanding.
    That being said, as @estradling75 said, it (faith) doesn't seem to be 100% definitionally consistent in usage. And there is certainly an argument to be made that one maintains faith even when having full knowledge and understanding. But not in the way Alma used the term, it seems.
    But as to the question, does perfect knowledge come from sight?" Absolutely not. There is nothing more reliable than the pure light and knowledge from God given to us as spiritual revelation. Nothing more concrete. No communication more perfect. Without it, we are lost.
    This is valuable if it is true. But I'd contend that claiming one knows the color of a car from looking at it but doesn't know if the Book of Mormon is true despite spiritual confirmation that it is is a very flawed premise.
    Once again...who are you to say who "knows" what? Speak for yourself.
    The two are not mutually exclusive in my view. I know certain things because of revelation. I also have faith in things. I don't undermine the one by the other. They are both true. I testify of what I know. That's what testimony means. I experienced. I witnessed. I felt. Etc. I testify of those things. That's what bearing testimony is. Saying I believe something that I haven't experienced IS NOT A TESTIMONY. What kind of witness would that make?
    "Did you see the murder happen?"
    "No. But I believe that John did it."
    That's not a testimony.
    Why is that the biggest aspect?
    I believe, as I've explained, the biggest aspect of faith is commitment. The knowledge relationship to it ties in...but not, I think, what really what makes or breaks faith. Faith is a choice. If it wasn't a choice then it couldn't be a commandment. We would have no agency in the matter. We couldn't be held accountable for not having it.
    Because we're speaking of what we "know".
    (I do understand that there are some who say they know when they don't. But I think you're mistaken to assume that's the typical case.)
    This is an interesting thing worth thinking about. I'll think about it.
  17. Like
    mrmarklin reacted to laronius in The slaying of Laban   
    The Nephite nation which was yet to be. They needed the brass plates he had. This is in contrast to the Mulekites who also came out of Jerusalem prior to the Babylonian captivity except they didn't bring any records with them. As a result when the two groups of people finally met up hundreds of years later the Mulekites had a corrupted language and religion. Fortunately, because the Nephites had the plates they were able to teach them both and they became one nation.
  18. Like
    mrmarklin reacted to Backroads in But I don't want to go to the funeral.   
    Well, if anyone cares, we wound up going on vacation instead, after some pondering and discussion. I don't think we were missed, per say, and honestly it wasn't a huge every-random-family-member ordeal. A viewing and a graveside service. Siblings, kids, and friends showed up. It was small, and my mom said it was very nice. 
    As for my own little family, I really do think it was good we took the time away as planned. 
  19. Like
    mrmarklin reacted to scottyg in Benefits of marrying for time only in the temple?   
    Agree 100%. Unfortunately it is the other way around. Government will continue to get more involved, the waters will become even more murky, and the definition of marriage will be soiled further.
    One day, He whose earth this is, will return and govern it properly.
  20. Like
    mrmarklin reacted to Suzie in Why did she stay?   
    The likelihood of this woman being stoned was approximately zero.
    Precisely, and this is why you can tell from the start that it was a set up. They weren't planning to stone the woman because they knew they didn't have legal grounds to do so. (Where is the man? Where are the witnesses? Who "found" her?). Jesus was very much aware of it and this is why he "stooped down and wrote on the ground".
    There are variant manuscripts that insert the phrase “the sins of each one of them” at the end of verse 6
    When someone was accused of committing a serious offense/sin, didn't the priest have to write their names and the charges against them? (often times, the temple floor was used for this purpose because it couldn't be permanent) so just maybe Jesus wrote both their sins and their names? In Jeremiah 17:13 (which was read also during the first seven days of the Feast of the Tabernacles) it says: " O Lord, the hope of Israel, all that aforsake thee shall be ashamed, and they that depart from me shall be written in the earth, because they have forsaken the Lord, the fountain of living waters."  It is interesting because just before this story, in John 7 Jesus refers to himself in a similar fashion (verses 14-15 of Jeremiah are also very interesting).
  21. Like
    mrmarklin reacted to Carborendum in US reactions?   
    If the President/Congress are of your political party, they're only doing it to protect the rest of the population. If the President/Congress are of the opposing political party, they're obviously bringing down the yoke of oppression upon us to lead us into a dictatorship.
  22. Like
    mrmarklin reacted to Vort in Can you cross the white line?   
    I'm fairly sure that the answer is no, it's not legal. I'm also fairly sure that as long as there is sufficient room and no property damage takes place, most cops won't waste their time ticketing someone for doing so. Maybe @mirkwood can provide insight, or at least give an informed opinion.
  23. Like
    mrmarklin reacted to Jamie123 in I just figured out what "stranded" means   
    There's also "The Strand" in London:

    The Thames was much wider in medieval times, so you can see how The Strand would once have been a beach of sorts - before the river was dredged and embankment built. 
  24. Like
    mrmarklin reacted to Phineas in The Tolerance of the Church   
    The church doesn’t hate anybody.  But you’ll still find individual church members that are jerks.  That shouldn’t be a surprise.
  25. Like
    mrmarklin got a reaction from Traveler in Is it easy or hard.   
    The people that do not live the gospel are doing it the hard way.  This is true, no matter how it seems.