Anddenex

"Appearance arouses yearning in fools"
Modesty, is an integral part of temperance. Modesty protects the intimate center of the person. It means refusing to unveil what should remain hidden. It is ordered to chastity to whose sensitivity it bears witness. It guides how one looks at others and behaves toward them in conformity with the dignity of persons and their solidarity. 
Modesty protects the mystery of persons and their love. It encourages patience and moderation in loving relationships; it requires that the conditions for the definitive giving and commitment of man and woman to one another be fulfilled. Modesty is decency. It inspires one's choice of clothing. It keeps silence or reserve where there is evident risk of unhealthy curiosity. It is discreet. 
There is a modesty of the feelings as well as of the body. It protests, for example, against the voyeuristic explorations of the human body in certain advertisements, or against the solicitations of certain media that go too far in the exhibition of intimate things. Modesty inspires a way of life which makes it possible to resist the allurements of fashion and the pressures of prevailing ideologies. 
The forms taken by modesty vary from one culture to another. Everywhere, however, modesty exists as an intuition of the spiritual dignity proper to man. Teaching modesty to children and adolescents means awakening in them respect for the human person.

I'm not sure what the issue is, and as one of the unwashed is there something more complicated that I'm missing?   It seems blatantly obvious to me as a heathen.  
Committing sin and unrepentant and/or willfully disobeying God equals no baptism.  
Follwing the will of God and obeying the church rules equals baptism should you choose it. 
Anyone can attend and even participate to a decent degree, but baptism requires a covenant with God.  
What am I missing?

Here you go, askedandanswer.  I suggest watching this would be a good 17 minute investment in everyone's time.
 

This has *nothing* to do with honoring and sustaining the law.  Adultery and fornication are legal, too.

Um. Moroni 8.

Later on we also read, "and other choice spirits who were reserved to come forth in the fulness of times." If we look at the individuals mentioned, all mentioned are ones who performed works mentioned in the Bible, and not just the everyday works. Adam is mentioned with Eve, and Eve being mentioned seems appropriate (surprised though Mary was named as one of the daughters seeing her important work).
Sure, we could say cultural, as well as work performed on this earth. It could also be who was present in Joseph F. Smith's mind and heart. For example, when we all go to a reunion, we don't mention in our journals all who were there, but we do point out specific people who more have an impact on our lives, in this case, specific to the bringing forth of the gospel of Jesus Christ in all dispensations. At least one person is mentioned from each dispensation.
EDIT: None of the prophets were mentioned in the Book of Mormon save these words, "All these and many more, even the prophets who dwelt among the Nephites and testified of the coming of the Son of God, mingled in the vast assembly and waited for their deliverance," Moroni is mentioned solely to say who he testified of was there.

Later on we also read, "and other choice spirits who were reserved to come forth in the fulness of times." If we look at the individuals mentioned, all mentioned are ones who performed works mentioned in the Bible, and not just the everyday works. Adam is mentioned with Eve, and Eve being mentioned seems appropriate (surprised though Mary was named as one of the daughters seeing her important work).
Sure, we could say cultural, as well as work performed on this earth. It could also be who was present in Joseph F. Smith's mind and heart. For example, when we all go to a reunion, we don't mention in our journals all who were there, but we do point out specific people who more have an impact on our lives, in this case, specific to the bringing forth of the gospel of Jesus Christ in all dispensations. At least one person is mentioned from each dispensation.
EDIT: None of the prophets were mentioned in the Book of Mormon save these words, "All these and many more, even the prophets who dwelt among the Nephites and testified of the coming of the Son of God, mingled in the vast assembly and waited for their deliverance," Moroni is mentioned solely to say who he testified of was there.

I know I've seen that pose somewhere before. . . hmm. . . oh yeah:

I'm sorry Vort, I think Vader's expressions come across much more clearly.  

Bro Uchdorf's view
On Sunday, Uchtdorf reiterated the church's position that it doesn't know the cause of homosexuality and that it doesn't matter.
"Many questions in life, however, including some related to same-gender attractions, must await a future answer, even in the next life," Uchtdorf said. "Until then, the truth is, God loves all his children, and because he loves us, we can trust him and keep his commandments."

I carry a spare green light globe and screw driver in my car so I can make a quick change when needed.

Further along the idea of succession of the prophet Joseph Smith belonging to the twelve we have Joseph Smith teaching:
‘I will give you a key that will never rust. If you will stay with the majority of the Twelve Apostles, and the records of the Church, you will never be led astray’”
We also have what is sometimes termed the last charge given to the apostles wherein Joseph rolls the kingdom off his shoulders and onto the brethren. 
Concerning Brigham Young in particular, I was listening to the dramatized church history audio recordings and heard them relay a story of Brigham speaking in tongues and the members feeling that Brother Joseph would set him straight soon enough, as he had done with others who were not acting on the spirit of the lord when doing so. In this instance Joseph, instead, defended Brigham's gift of the spirit and declared he had spoken in the pure Adamic language and would one day preside over the church. I wondered if this could be verified or if it was a bit of artistic licence taken in the dramatization of the narrative. I was pleased when I was able to later find that there is a record of this event in the 25th volume of the millenial star on page 439 under the heading of History of Brigham.
http://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/cdm/compoundobject/collection/MStar/id/7990/rec/56
This links to the issue in question, simply jump to no.28 July 11 1863 and click on the heading for Brigham's history, then scroll to page 439 and read away.

I just came across this tonight and thought of you. This is a Joseph Smith quote cited in Elder Haight's talk on Solemn Assemblies:
 

Yes, and if you find yourself asking this question, definitely see your bishop.

Short answer yes.  
i suspect that you may be a minor.  If so STOP looking at porn. Stop it now. It has been said in previous posts it will infect your mind and your spirit. It is not real, those who make it are victims and those who consume it become victims of the evil within it. If you are unable to stop or have frequent relapses see your bishop ASAP. 
As far as masturbation is concerned you need to learn to control your body. This is not an easy task especially when you are young but it is not impossible. If you have a problem with self abuse see your bishop immediately. 
I would highly recommend a conversation with your bishop and let him know where you stand. he can get you on a path that leads you in the right direction. 

That's straight out of For the Strength of Youth. 
Council with the Lord and His stewards over you (priesthood leaders) on the best way for you to stop this behavior. Clear your browser history and take anything remotely pornographic to the nearest trash receptacle, and then take them to the nearest dumpster. Don't even wait for garbage day. These are your weapons of rebellion. Bury them deep, my friend. (Alma 23 and 24)

Beside the ecclesiastical reasons of which are quite valid, mental health wise, looking at porn gives a very unrealistic view of the nude human body, for NORMAL people are not "Built" like that (usually), the expectation can be projected upon a spouse of future spouse, and there's trouble. Twofold, sexual release with viewing porn is no less than having had relations with the women you are viewing during release. 
Porn is absolutely the devil's playground, it's inherently dangerous. Don't think for a moment those are victimless crimes, you may have a handful of players, yet so many more that are victims of human trafficking. Much suffering goes into porn, there is the physical suffering, the self esteem loss, then the spiritual suffering (Separation from God and the holy spirit). 
No one will, or should, be more beautiful to you in a disrobed state than your wife, or wife to be. I am blessed to be married to the woman of my dreams, whom shares with me the things only a husband should ever know. I don't just have her body, but I have her beautiful heart too. Blessed be the name of the lord, I thank him for my wife, who loves me so much. 

Yes and yes.  
Sexual activities are reserved for bonding between spouses, which is holy and enjoyable.   When you look at a women other than your spouse sexually, you are violating the LoC and cheating on your future wife.  Every time you engage in sexual activity with someone other than your wife (including just yourself), you are cheating on her and violating the LoC.
Cheating is addictive.  Stopping these habits is something you can't just "white knuckle" try to quit on your own.  You need help.  Go speak to your bishop and he will point you in the right direction.   You need not be chained with this sin any longer.

Yes.
Christ counseled specifically against looking upon a woman to lust after her, and compared it to adultery.  Both are violations of God's Law.

@Anonymous1101, Welcome to the forums!
To answer your question, yes, it does.  Please go visit with your bishop right away so he can help you to start the repentance process!  You will be glad you did!  Don't wait.

Welcome @Anonymous1101. As several others have pointed out the answer is yes it is. Here is an article on the topic for parents teaching children about the Law of Chastity, but the principles apply to everyone  https://www.lds.org/ensign/1986/12/talking-with-your-children-about-moral-purity?lang=eng
Avoid pornography like a plague my friend it will lead you too nothing but misery and unhappiness. But don't despair. The church has a large number of resources to help you get over this. First go to your Bishop, confess, and follow his counsel as he is Christ's servant. In addition take a look at the Church's addiction recovery book. I promise you that through the Grace of Jesus Christ you can be forgiven and can overcome your problems with the Law of Chastity. The earlier you start the better. 

Masturbation is not a good thing. You need to develop the self-control not to masturbate. As an adult or even a teenager, you are expected to have overcome this. If you want to be worthy of a temple recommend, you will need to stop masturbating. If you can't overcome this alone, please talk to your bishop.
Looking at pornography is a bad thing. It destroys your ability to feel the Spirit and badly warps your view of women and sexuality. Please, get help from your bishop immediately to quit the pornography usage.
Masturbating to pornography is spiritual cyanide. Absolutely, by all means, please do not do this, and if you're doing it, take whatever steps are necessary to stop it. Masturbating to pornography can lead ONLY to despair and sexual/spiritual ruin. Nothing good -- NOTHING -- can come of such a thing. I cannot overemphasize how harmful it is to masturbate to pornography. In doing so, you are literally programming your brain and your genitals to respond to exactly the thing you don't want to do. PLEASE, BROTHER, FOR YOUR OWN SAKE, TALK TO YOUR DAD AND/OR MOM (if you're a minor) AND/OR BISHOP ABOUT THIS IMMEDIATELY. TONIGHT.
I am serious. Go for help right now. Do not wait. It probably seems like a big, embarrassing thing, but you don't want to put this off. Please do not risk a lifetime of suffering because of some youthful pride. What you are doing risks destroying some of the most important aspects of your personality and very being. Please get help NOW.
Come back and tell us what's going on. Stay anonymous, that's fine. Just let us know that you're proactively doing something about this.
And by the way: YOU CAN'T DO THIS ALONE. If you think you can, you are almost certainly deceiving yourself.

Welcome, Anonymous1101!
The short answer to your question is, "yes".
The slightly less-short answer is that while all violations of the LoC are problematic, they are not all equal in gravity.  A person who has a porn problem probably isn't going to see the same ecclesiastical discipline as an adulterer, for example.
But, they do all require priesthood-leader assistance to resolve.  And combining porn and masturbation creates and reinforces some neural pathways and associations that will be very, very hard to undo from an addiction/mental health standpoint; so the earlier you break those habits, the better off you'll be.

For me one of the best expressions of spiritual influences is Moroni Chapter 10.  I have hinted about the “hive mind” and the concept of collective intelligence being superior to the single source but super intelligence.  I have speculated that G-d extends and increases his intelligence (glory) not by his greatness but in including the intelligence and greatness of others.  Satan being the opposite – glorying only in himself.  Sometimes (most often) being touched by the spirit is not just about self and what the self can comprehend but more so the spirit connects us to others to the greater appreciation of their intelligence (and spiritual gifts) rather than just our own.
 
The Traveler

When I think of your question I think of this quote from Joseph Smith, “A person may profit by noticing the first intimation of the spirit of revelation; for instance, when you feel pure intelligence flowing into you, it may give you sudden strokes of ideas.” (History of the Church, 3:381.)"
Yes, emotions are different than the Spirit dictating truth; however, we also know fruits of the spirit are "joy, peace, love..." which are all emotions. I am one of those that believes the Spirit witnesses the truth to everyone the same, the result of feeling the Spirit may be different, just as "joy" and "love" are different emotions, feelings, but can be felt at the same time.
People can often get deceived if they rely to heavily on their emotions to specify what the Spirit is saying. I like Doctrine & Covenants 8: 2-3 the best with regards to the Spirit and its witness.