Crypto

I agree in part.( please forgive me if i'm reading to far into this) There is an underlying trend i've been noticing brought up in church on occasion, it's this idea that all things physical, carnal are bad. People hinting that their bodies are gross and disgusting, their appetites are bad etc. It is the job of the Spiritual to over come the Physical, but that doesn't mean the physical is bad. We got our bodies because they are good. Yes they and physical things can be used improperly, and there are flaws because of the fallen state of the world, but sometimes people need to remember of how physical things are also a blessing, to complement the spirit. https://www.lds.org/scriptures/dc-testament/dc/93.33?lang=eng#32 The body complements the spirit, to receive a fullness of joy.

btw I see misunderstanding happening on both sides... imo at least...

I think backroads concisely illustrated the difference in thinking. Different people prioritize different virtues, in this case idea of stealing versus charity. Different paradigms. When presenting facts from differing paradigms under such paradigms I would suggest that not much agreement will be found. When it comes down to it which is more important to you, Freedom, Justice, Charity, or Goodwill? Which you do prioritize at the expense of the others? Is there a way to do this without putting something at the expense of another virtue?

haha, don't worry about being obtuse. I don't think i'm going to exactly define a successful marriage, since it would be subjective to each individual. I think the minimum standard of success would be where the relationship is in a healthy state, where each would like to continue with the relationship on average at least. Many good thoughts from people, I might chime in a bit later.

I've heard from teachers that teenageritis generally hits after winter break in the 6th grade. Prepare yourself anatess!

I kinda curious about people's General advise for the do' s and do nots for having a successful marriage. If your marriage has been successful, what good things have you and your partner done that you feel have contributed to it's success? What troubles have you had to work through? If you have had a failed marriage, why did it fail, what do you think could have changed the result? Despite the problems was there anything that really worked out well? If you remarried, what have you and your partner done differently? What do you feel should be avoided? Were there expectations you brought in that turned out differently? Are there things you looked for in a partner that made a difference? Any other thoughts and comments?

Diligence Only a few years ago this was probably one of my strongest strengths, now it's a weakness. I lost a few of the talents I was supposed to multiply. It seems much harder to regain something you have lost than to keep it. Don't do it, seriously, be Diligent. Diligence in my own life will improve nearly every other aspect, so that's why I choose it.

If anything would save a marriage, I think true love and open affection helps. I remember reading a story about a woman who was going to be divorced had only one request, to be hugged/held everyday for a month, and afterwards if the husband still found divorce agreeable she would go along with it. People give and receive love in different ways, and when hostile arguments arise, love, charity, and compassion are proverbially pushed off the stage and replace with the actors of darker feelings. Marriage counselling would be ideal. It will be hard for people on the internet to give you the advise and counsel you need. There could be more going on, and we don't know you personally, which makes things a little more difficult. If divorce happens, allow yourself to go through the grief cycle. Most importantly find someone you can trust to help you through it. Keep strong, now might seem like a dark time indeed but along the horizon there will be a bright future shinning.

This sounds like a friendship doorslam. The term is particularly used by INFJ's, a particular personality type defined by the MBTI typology test. I don't think it would be a good idea to slam the door on friends because of timing mismatches for enjoying each others company. While hurtful to you they might not realize what they are doing, so it will probably leave them confused while having no idea what caused it. I'll admit, unless they are being destructive to your life I really don't understand why people do this shutting out thing. I understand setting boundaries, it is a healthy thing, but burning bridges seems a little extreme and not so healthy to me. Communication, patience, and knowing your own boundaries are key to maintaining a healthy relationship. (I think at least)

I got one.

I have a feeling many latter day saints will agree and believe with what you are looking for, but how they would try and achieve it will be very different. I believe the gospel and this church provide what you are looking for. (Barring human fallibility and the fallen state of human nature, which individuals sometime make mistakes because of) I see this in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. I hope you might consider stopping by in person and consider what is taught. You will find a variety of opinions that differ greatly. I have spent time in this church in other countries, where the views that many here on this board have expressed will be vehemently disagreed with, yet we all agree in the doctrines of Christ and it's redeeming grace. Well wishes on your journey forward, and I hope you find a community that you seek, and the truth that you desire. Fair travels. I enjoyed some of your posts, and hope to see you stop by on occasion. *Some advise as you continue your search, You might find additional enlightenment of ways people act and disagree yet still to achieve the same goal.

Hello :)

"Salutations, Salutations, to great expectations expectations expectations. How's the whether?"

You might appreciate reading the book "The God Who Weeps" by Terryl Givens and Fiona Givens. It is not too long, but is a deep book, The type you take time to read and appreciate. It is about "God has a heart that beats in sympathy with human hearts, feeling our joy and sorrowing over our pain" I haven't quite finished it yet, but I can already recommend and tell it is a wonderful book.

Intellectually, feelings are not a solid form of evidence. However to deny our emotions and feelings is to deny a part of our very humanity. Emotions are largely our guide to morals, such as a near universal feeling that murdering people for "fun"(I really can't see murder as fun) is intrinsically wrong. Emotions act as a compass that point us towards the things we think intellectually, are motivated to do, and believe. As such I personally believe emotions have validity, not as solid evidence, nor as something that can't mislead, just as logic can also mislead, but as the compass that it seems to be. On the spiritual side of things, the holy ghost is described as a still small voice. You Don't have to feel a burning bosom to be feeling the holy ghost. Actually I think the holy ghost speaks through quiet feelings of peace and comfort more so than other methods. I Don't think the spirit is exactly the same as my regular emotions, but I'd take into consideration where that compass of yours is pointing towards. (The holy ghost is like a compass to Isn't it? Maybe that's why we describe it like feelings or a prompting)

I'm not quite sure how opinions on taxes apply to not being charitable. Taxes fund political endeavors, and often projects, some of which will be charitable some of which will not. The first thing to understand is that from a conservative perspective it is not the role of government to take care of the poor and needy, it is each individual as a collective' s duty. The more liberal mindset is that the government should take care of the poor and needy (and through taxes or other methods via government everyone contributes) The statistics on charitable contributions is higher among conservatives than liberals. (My source is a freakanomics podcast). So even if there is disagreement about taxes it has little to do with if people are charitable or not. Either political view is still concerned about the poor and needy and their fellow man. To state otherwise is to misrepresent both. (Also appealing to law and/or majority as morally good are both logical fallacies)

D&C 1:38 "38 What I the Lord have spoken, I have spoken, and I excuse not myself; and though the heavens and the earth pass away, my word shall not pass away, but shall all be fulfilled, whether by mine own voice or by the voice of my servants, it is the same."

To start, my intended usage of extortion was as a synonym to theft. It wasn't too important to the idea what type of theft I portrayed. The argument is that taxes can be theft when certain criteria are met, but that not all taxes are theft, since I believe there is nuance. Government is simply a macro form of a community, and communities exist and thrive to some extent by sharing resources, whether that is land and the food thereon, time, talent, effort, belongings, or money to maintain generally agreed upon societal standards. Such as a tribe where hunters share the hunted food they capture, and get vegetables from what others have gathered, or baskets to hold stuff etc. Modern society is a little more complex and has several generally agreed upon institutions that the society pools resources to maintain, military, police, schools, infrastructure, etc. Whether it is maintained by donation of time, effort, or money. Taxes is simply the mandated pooling of resources to maintain that society if you wish to benefit from such pooling, It is an exchange or trade. You are not forced to pay taxes, but when residing in a jurisdiction that pooled resources cover there are penalties associated with not paying taxes to offset the benefits, since it would be difficult to prohibit you from benefiting, and act as a deterrent from free loading. The alternative is to move to a territory without pooled resources (something increasingly difficult in the modern era) Considering no two individuals will exactly align in how they view society should be set up, it is untenable to create a system that fits all. Now if you stated something more similar to the more central the government authority, the less there authority on what should rightfully be regulated at a community or local level I would agree with you. That being said, there are times when taxes are/can be tantamount to theft.

You completely ignored the complete argument, your response doesn't address what I said at all.

This is how I understand these passages: 1 Corinthians 13:12 KJV So in context this chapter is discussing even if we speak "with the tongues of men and of angels" (prophesy) without charity " I am nothing." This development from child to adult seems descriptive of learning, and several of the traits we need to develop. Then understanding in fullness our divine potential, even as God knows. It strongly implies prophesy shall no longer be in part, but in full. Colossians 2:9-10 We need the messiah in order to partake of salvation.

Oh Is the counselor/therapist you are seeing a man or a woman? Sometimes in therapy a man will feel like his voice isn't being heard, and will view therapy similarly to a nagging session (which might be related to the gender of the therapist). I would recommend also seeing a woman counselor/therapist for similar reasons. It might be beneficial to work with multiple people one of each gender in some circumstances. Abusive behavior on part of either spouse is unacceptable. I feel for your situation and hope that you can find the hope for a bright future ahead of you.

It might help to see a doctor, in additional to everyone else's great spiritual and practical advice. There are several medical conditions that can sometimes affect peoples mood and behavior, such as depression, blood sugar levels(diabetes), and a whole slew of other fairly common conditions (hypertension, hormonal imbalances etc...).

tax = theft when it goes against the collective will of the community. Therefore not all taxes are theft. When a tax levies a greater burden than benefit on a population, If a tax improves the condition of one population at the detriment of another it is tantamount to extortion.

I'd go with the family, but that's just what my family kinda does and expects when visiting.

First step to check is to see if your email is in your ward directory.