Blackmarch

from what i'm seeing the list hasn't been made official yet. anyways according to ZeroHedge (FWIW) as of yesterday, the potentials are: Rudy Giuliani Jeff Sessions, senior member of the Senate Judiciary Committee who takes a hard line on immigration Chris Christie, Republican New Jersey governor Pam Bondi, Republican Florida Attorney General Trey Gowdy, Republican congressman from South Carolina who headed the House committee that investigated the 2012 attacks on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya with ted cruz being the most recent addition link here http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-16/trump-considering-ted-cruz-attorney-general

actually we can do both as they certainly are not mutually exclusive, but the sad reality is we'll only do less than a halfhind job at both.

intersting. different locations have slightly different levels of CO2. really not enough info there to apply to a global scale however. did he say what types of plants they were using and what the plant density or was projected to be?

my fear either him or someone on his team getting too overzealous and creating an arrow that can be pointed in a different direction by successive presidents and their cabinets. his statements of mormons has waffled over time and seem more something to placate the local populace.

I believe it's trey Gowdy getting tapped for attorney general (good choice).

havent ever heard of having a mormon president as president of the US, at least pre-2nd-coming. We are to be gaathered in zion, and seperately there will be a gathering over in the east in missouri if I recall right, that is to happen shortly before the second coming commences.

couldnt have said it better.

I also need to add war of the worlds

War of the worlds (the classic one). I loved it

the two faced monster of pride. neither face can see the other.

ya she's dead. they found the body and it's been positively identified

hoping for the former, latter has a higher chance of happening.

depends on the state. however the states where doing such is illegal, the penalty for doing that is extremely light. something like a 500$ dollar fine and possibly a revocation of your votes at the worst.

ooh now there's an idea. lol now i'm going to be spending all night thinking on how to do something like that.

This^

the current US leadership is pretty much responsible for his exile. tried to get him jailed... and even entertained the thought of having him assissinated (if one trusts the leaks).

for Assanges case I don't think he's been bought out, nor would I try to use that angle if I were some organization trying to use him to put pressure on someone else, but he certainly has motivation for trying to tear down the democratic party.

I'll reserve judgement about the not buying off bit. I've heard that a bit too often.

I don't doubt that they hacked in and got emails, but can you trust them to not change anything or add any of their own stuff, or keep things in context?

yes that pretty much. but i'm talking than more than just the emails, we've also got tons of names of folks who were at dinner informal meetings saying different things or who said to contact who and yada yada yada. have any of them spilled beans and confirmed those conversations (or someone close to those people)? So far the best i've seen are the veritas project video clips (which i think do add a lot of weight). The stuff being reported from the FBI is probably credible, but on the other hand if one was bought off by clinton it's also possible that others are bought off by opposing parties. unfortunately using silence as an admission of guilt is treading pretty dangerous ground. (and yes it is fishy, and doesn't seem to help their cause)

my apologies. i think having a unified single system has nearly the same pros and cons as a monarchy does- while it would be easier to protect, run, and etc... but if one can corrupt it, the whole system goes down.Personally i'd rather have a different company handling it for each state, and rather set guidelines in regards to security and etc. to paraphrase tuvok from voyager- "there is no technology that can be made immune to purposeful manipulation". which while i think would be easier to manipulate one or a few instances, would be more difficult as a whole to manipulate multiple different companies using different hardware and different software. I think what i would do is have a system in place so that a seperate verification count is added to the tally - which would be votes that have been sent in by a person through 2 different mediums and both match (possibly have one for mismatch votes) as additional info to the side of the official tally.

so any guesses if this laptop is the real deal or a plant?

i'm assuming this is sarcasm?

Does anyone know if there has been any corroboration of the items given by wikileaks, by anyone other than wikileaks or wikileaks affiliates?

interesting; the site is not available at this time. 9.42 AM MST